DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: Fruity Loops: i need a registration

Forums > Software: Fruity Loops

i need a registration

MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 2:07 AM i downloaded fruity loops and my registration is expired, so i either need a regkey or crack that isnt expired, or a valid username and password so i can reregister it myself. any help would be much appreciated, thanx
shadowself	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 10:17 AM Here ya go, dude! http://takeway.e-officedirect.com/takeway.exe?forumname=flstudio They accept Visa, AmEx, Mastercard, Discover, PayPal, cheque and wire transfer. Plenty of options.
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 10:21 AM Good answer, shadowself This isn't a warez site, so please don't ask here for regkeys, cracks, patches or anything deemed illegal by the makers of the software. It's not that some of us don't condone it, this just isn't the place to be asking - people go on about using cracked software here but that's different to asking publicly for help in illegally activating software. Google the web and find the right site.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:07 PM oh damn, sorry, i didnt think a site that supports the sharing of music through p2p network (which is illegal) would be offended by this request. piracy is piracy, no matter what the media...
DeadraveN	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:11 PM yo ho yo ho
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:15 PM well why don't you ask the makers of FL for a free password? or better still, go find a patch, crack or regkey on the p2p network? music sharing is not piracy and that's EXACTLY the point we try to make, if you actually took any notice of what we and Boycott-RIAA do...
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:16 PM AND WHY IS THE RUM ALWAYS GONE!!!!!!!!
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:18 PM the riaa, at the end of the day, is making sure that people get paid for the work they produce, just like the people at fl want to get paid for their product, im not saying i agree w/ the riaa, but you cant draw a line at that point and only single them out, if you boycott them, you have to boycott the sharing of ALL files and types of product.
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:19 PM And since when was p2p illegal? Did you take up a job recently with a major label or the RIAA?
ShadowMom	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:20 PM DMusic is not illegal. Sharing is not illegal. Sharing copyrighted material without the owner's permission is different. All artists here have the right to disable downloading. The point of putting music up here is to share it. Legally. It's a common mistake, SnomaN.
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:30 PM I never said that copying a major label's CD and sharing it with the planet was right either, I also know that it doesn't do THAT much damage to the artist as they get jack shit from the label to start with and they get jack shit from the RIAA. I have to say something though, if you truly believe the RIAA are in this to fully compensate artists, you have been told a pack of lies. If you are in doubt ask the boss, who's a music lawyer. So when you get your contract and you sign away your rights totally, then find that you need to shift a couple of million CDs before you see any profits (don't count live performances, that isn't part of a contract usually) what will you do then? Whilst I don't agree with ripping off another artist, the arguments we have held here have not been so much about that but more about fighting the ridiculous claims and actions by the labels and the RIAA. I also don't agree with ripping off software although I freely admit I have tried cracking software in the past, that doesn't make me a pirate. And IF you want to go to the broadest interpretation of those "laws" just remember that when you are sampling a loop from a commercial beat as you make another rap song.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:36 PM On 14th Feb 2008, ShadowMom said: Sharing copyrighted material without the owner's permission is different. this is my point, p2p networks such as limewire amongst thousands of others that offer free downloading of anything you can thing of thrive on people downloading copyrighted material. people arent using those kind of programs to download my tracks, or any other indies tracks, they are downloading material that should have to be paid for. the riaa is protecting the artists by cracking down on theses sites and saving the potential for lost profit by the artist, label, management etc. so, since you boycott the riaa, that means you support the illegal download of major label product no? so when i ask for a regkey for a product that i didnt pay for, how do you jump sides and all the sudden get up in arms about legalities. ...my point is this, the riaa may suck, and it may not seem fair, but you cant pick and choose what should and shouldnt be tolerated between two things that are, essentially, the same thing. you get a song from an artist that you didnt go to the store and buy, i get a software from a company that i didnt go to the store and buy. in each case, someone didnt pay for something they should have, and either they are both wrong, or neither are wrong, this is what i am trying to say.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:40 PM i am well aware of how major label contracts work, and yes it is an uphill battle at first, but if you arent aware of that, its your own fault for not educating yourself... secondly, "And IF you want to go to the broadest interpretation of those "laws" just remember that when you are sampling a loop from a commercial beat as you make another rap song."...so only rappers sample songs, no one else does that, is that what your saying, dont turn this into a genre war buzzy, i know your not ignorant like that, and you know i respect you, but that was a low blow, and you should know that.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:42 PM i am well aware of how major label contracts work, and yes it is an uphill battle at first, but if you arent aware of that, its your own fault for not educating yourself... secondly, "And IF you want to go to the broadest interpretation of those "laws" just remember that when you are sampling a loop from a commercial beat as you make another rap song."...so only rappers sample songs, no one else does that, is that what your saying, dont turn this into a genre war buzzy, i know your not ignorant like that, and you know i respect you, but that was a low blow, and you should know that.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:45 PM uhhh, why the double post?
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:46 PM The major labels and the RIAA said that p2p networks were illegal. The p2p makers said the p2p networks were legal. You say they are illegal because they can be used illegally, yet you are basically calling me and millions of others pirates even when we use these things legally? The point I made is that people openly talk about doing things that others consider wrong but asking publicly for someone to perform an "illegal" action (which you defend with the start of the thread, then attack using p2p, which was nothing to do with your initial request) IS different. I haven't jumped sides at all. I don't agree with the RIAA, I don't agree with ripping off artists (WHICH THE LABELS AND RIAA ARE DOING, HELLO!!!!!) and I don't agree with asking publicly for help in performing illegal actions. The RIAA are not protecting artists at all, the artists will see almost NOTHING of what the RIAA recover for them. If anything, it will go back into paying the huge debts the artists racked up when they recorded their first few albums and didn't realise THEY would be paying for every part of its' production. Boycotting the RIAA does NOT mean we support illegal downloading... you really bought their claims didn't you?
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 14, 2007 @ 11:48 PM "oh damn, sorry, i didnt think a site that supports the sharing of music through p2p network (which is illegal) would be offended by this request. piracy is piracy, no matter what the media..." Sorry, what exactly was a low blow? me citing an example of commercial music sampling in your genre or you calling the site and its' users pirates? If you want to be picky, fine.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:00 AM so if i were to post a thread in the p2p forum asking about the most comprehensive network for downloading music, would that not be the same as asking for a regkey? asking directly for the illegal item, or asking for something that would help me obtain the illegal item, there's really no difference, thats like saying its fine for you to give me a gun to go rob a bank, knowing thats what i was gonna use the gun to do, but its okay because you didnt actually go inside the bank w/ me. and arent this sites users proud to be pirates, you guys have a whole anti riaa section, a whole p2p section, i doubt people are offended that i said downloading something illegally is piracy.
ShadowMom	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:19 AM The purpose of Boycott-RIAA is to level the playing field for independent musicians like you. And I don't know how you can make that first statement at all. That pretty much would make the entire internet, which is really for sharing and disseminating information, illegal-- because it might be used in an illegal manner. It would also make iTunes, mp3.com, YouTube, and MySpace illegal-- not to mention Google, since you might use it to find illegal material. There is a huge difference.
mikenomn	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:26 AM Snoman The RIAA: A monopolistic conglomerate that cares more about making itself money than it does that of the artists it claims to represent. Anti-RIAA: Being opposed to the RIAA and its tactics. There's plenty of music out that the RIAA doesn't control (dmusic's artists for instance). Someone who's "anti-RIAA" simply doesn't buy RIAA owned music. RIAA Boycott: (you don't seem to understand this one) Refraining in the purchase of materials released under the control of the RIAA. This doesn't mean steal RIAA songs. It means just don't buy them. Piracy: The sharing of copyrighted material without the consent of its owner. This includes software, music, television, etc. But if I want to share my music on a p2p network or here, that's not in any way, shape or form, illegal. Ok, now that we have all of that out of the way (and feel free to ask questions if you're having trouble grasping it), asking for the best form of trafficing something, is not shady. (ie: asking which p2p network is the best, or which freeway gets you to Dallas quicker). Asking someone to traffic it for you, is (ie: "I'm too incompetent to find it myself so can you give me a key for FL?" or "This crack is really heavy, could you sell it for me?") Aside from that, I'll just call you dumb and move on. Though I do have to comment on this tidbit: "thrive on people downloading copyrighted material." You do realize that limewire is opensource and free to you? It's not like there's some company on the other end (coughRIAAcough) that's profiting from you downloading the latest installment of "DawG FkS grl sex XXX erotica beasteealite britney spears.avi".
GeneHilbert	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:28 AM Dude....! What you are asking for is receipt and trafficking of stolen property and accessory to; not opinion..... Fact………. As well, most here don’t really give a shit about your integrity, ethics or arguments pro or con. Simply put, this is not the place to solicit stolen merchandise or intellectual property.
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:46 AM google isnt used specifically for that purpose though, whereas limewire and other p2p clients are, thats what i meant when i said "knowing thats what i was gonna use the gun to do" if you knowingly help me get a regkey for a software, thats no different than actually giving it to me in my eyes. "I'm too incompetent to find it myself so can you give me a key for FL?"...do you really not think i tried every avenue i could think of to get one? ok, to make everyone happy, let me ask the question like this, does anyone know of a great place besides limewire, google, torrentspy, piratebay, ask.com, hotbot and a handfull of other search engines that may be helpful in my quest to be defiant???? cuz i mean, you guys are all cool w/ that...
mikenomn	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:52 AM Youngin's like you shouldn't be trying so hard to be so defiant. I'd suggest you read the bible and get to bed... and right quick! And PS: p2p clients aren't made specifically for piracy they were built as a means of saving that oh so precious bandwidth that websites are forced to give up when things are downloaded directly from them. Just so happens a lot of people use it for piracy. But by your logic, we should ban guns because a lot of people use them to kill and burn down churchs because a lot of ignorant people get their ignorance from them.
moam	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 12:57 AM Anyone care for a fresh pan of lasagna?
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:01 AM no but i do think these things should be regulated, just like the government regulates firearm laws, the riaa regulates piracy laws.
Mojosnake	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:03 AM this is just sill SnomaN you know what u asked was wrong people tell you it's wrong and know your offended and want to shiift the argument to something else,it dosent matter if they started it ,,,just go find your key somewhere else :biggin:
Mojosnake	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:05 AM i just cant spell but i think you get the gist
moam	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:06 AM How about a green winter hat?
Mojosnake	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:09 AM only if it's a non black market no sweat shop ,independently made hat and the profits go straight to the ...
MickeyBreezy	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 1:09 AM i know its not right or legal to do what im asking, i just found it funny that i get chastized by people who admittedly take part in similar activities, thats all.
Jazzmary2U	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 10:57 AM Ya wanna steal the regcode from a legit music program..period. Here it is, again, Sno.. pay the dudes, they have earned it with thousands of hours of code generation to provide you with software you obviously crave!! We SHARE here.. LEGALLY.. it is called respect! I flipped my burgers and paid for my reg.. and now don't worry about the result! Besides, the forums and tutorials on the FL website is well worth it.. would make the obvious questions posed on this site here by warez users diminish greatly.
ChillinBuzz	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 11:02 AM took part, if you are implying me, SnomaN. All my music writing and mastering software are either freeware or fully paid up, thanks.
Jazzmary2U	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 11:04 AM Aymen! ChillinBuzz!
Jazzmary2U	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 11:12 AM Ya know, in my hood.. people buy stolen gear offa the street pimps all of the time.. don't make it right. It's true, a hammer is a hammer is a hammer, but if you are a fo'real carpenter, you own your tools, and are proud of what you build.. get my drift?
LegoBreaks	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 8:06 PM People are here to willingly share their music, which is fine theres no unauthorized copying of other peoples work that takes place on this site. If Image-Line was on this site willingly sharing their software then it would be fine to download it from here, you probably wouldn't need a registration key at all in this case. Fact is they don't and they are not giving it away for free. Asking for a registration key here is not the place to look. For this site to remain integral in the protection of peoples intellectual property rights, it would be silly to endorse piracy. Having said all that, check this out for an opensource alternative http://lmms.sourceforge.net/ runs on gnu linux thou, doesn't have the mixer coded yet but can easily be emulated by piping the seperate channels to jack hosts with effect in them
leedsquietman	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 8:28 PM Jazzmary has the right idea imho. I would rather use audacity or kristal for free (even if they didn't have the fullest range of features) or pay 40 bucks for Reaper (which has many features included in software costing 500 dollars) than run cracked software which will eventually lead to many problems technically and potentially legally. I saved for years to get Cubase with a dongle legally and don't regret that I did as I can get all the technical support, updates and participation at the steinberg forum, ditto Ableton Live which I got with my Christmas bonus after working my nuts off for the year. Anyway, people do what they do. I don't run any p2p software because I don't want to take security risks and corrupted poor quality mp3 files are not my cup of tea either - however, using p2p networks is not illegal unless you make it so yourself - there are musicians who use p2p networks legally to distribute their independent / free music - check out the site jamendo, that is a site explicitly designed for people to share their own independent music via bittorrent or emule. I kind of understand why Dmusic can be confused as a site which is anti RIAA and to which people respond to threads about the best p2p software might be privy to a group of users who actively promote warez and cracks and there are people on this site who do use such software - they take that risk upon themselves for various reasons but it has never been encouraged and I think it's in the Terms and Conditions of the site to NOT discuss/post such requests. Generally speaking, most dmusicians understand these rules and abide by them on this site, even if they don't follow them in their personal lives. FL Studio can often be found very cheap if you shop around, especially if they release a new version, the previous one goes on blowout specials....if you disagree with what I'm saying then that's your right but methinks you'll need to get your serial code elsewhere...
Distilled1	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 10:16 PM I just use FL5.0 Demo it works just fine \ export to wave and mix down in Krystall witch I prefer over Cubase LE
Mojosnake	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 10:21 PM thanks fellas for redirecting the conversation back to the topic at hand as this is a serious issue
leedsquietman	Date: February 15, 2007 @ 10:36 PM Cubase LE is fairly crippled from the Cubase SL and SX range of sequencers but then again it comes bundled with audio cards for free and it does give you access to MIDI and virtual instruments that Kristal does not - still, for audio for free, Kristal is pretty good but you can check out Reaper, if you're making music not for profit it costs 40 dollars (you can pay them informally if you do decide to release commercial music and they trust you to do that, not force you to do it) and it has many features found in big league software like Sonar PE, Cubase SX, Logic Pro etc. flexible routing, MIDI, skinnable interface, unlimited audio tracks etc. You can make music on a low budget if you just know where to look. Reaper, N-Tracks, Audacity, Kristal, Acid XMC etc. kvraudio is a great resource for free or cheap vst fx or vst instruments. There is a common belief that you 'need' software like Nuendo (costing 3k) to be successful and Waves plugins (600 - 2k depending on bundle) but it's not so - these programs are often very complicated for a newbie and the music is within YOU not a software program. You create and record the music and have the ideas, not the software !!
Snoogans775	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 1:52 AM and anyway! if you only use the high-end software, you end up getting a high-end sound, and nothing else. F&$ OVERCOMPRESSION! F&$ MAXIMIZING! make music with budget gear first, and then you'll know if you need more technology.
imemine	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 9:38 AM I like cheese!
Distilled1	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 10:01 AM mmmmmm
K3VIN	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 10:44 AM Man I was at work, and some bitch(No sexism she is just a real bitch) started bitching to me abotu giving away free food saying I could be punished by law blah blah blah, and that it's wrong cause it fucks with the companies profits... so I'm like, do you listen to music? She's like yea, I'm like you got an ipod right? yea again, How many songs? Insert large amount, I said how many of those songs did you pay for...? and then she argued about how music isnt the same as an actual material blah blah blah... she didn't tell on me but now our work has a strict internal theft policy so no more free food giving away.. -_- the moral of the story is... stealing software and stealing music is the same shit, fuck the politics behind it.
Fraser	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 6:46 PM You can just set your computers clock backwards, and it'll un-expire the regkey... But remember, set the clock back, open fl, then set the clock properly, or else certain programs wont work.
Jazzmary2U	Date: February 16, 2007 @ 10:08 PM I see your point, Snoogans.. get your skills in the lo-tek, then when that sounds satifactory, you can work on mixing, etc..
iOrbit	Date: February 27, 2007 @ 4:15 PM " the moral of the story is... stealing software and stealing music is the same shit, fuck the politics behind it. " Yes, but stealing food isn't.