DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads

Forums > The General Forum

Making Mp3

Ramonesworsh...	Date: February 19, 2006 @ 11:16 AM I know that I can export to iTunes but how to mp3.
Ramonesworsh...	Date: February 19, 2006 @ 11:17 AM O sorry I didnt realize there already was one of these. Can someone answer anyway.
hate9wicket	Date: February 21, 2006 @ 1:05 AM Highlight the song you exported from GB, then go up top, there should be convert selection to mp3, so then you have two versions, the aiff and mp3, when you go to your song file on DMusic to upload, make sure you've changed the name to something w/o spaces, like_this_kind_of_thing.mp3, select the right file, and it will take a while for it to upload, so go away from the computer for awhile, you'll get notified if it was uploaded correctly, test it by dling, and streaming it, then go and license it if it is an original of yours.
ursabear	Date: March 1, 2006 @ 9:41 PM Preferences In the Prefs window click the "Advanced" icon (looks like a gear) Click "Importing" In the "Import Using" popup, choose "MP3 Encoder" and choose how good you want the file to sound (from the "Setting" popup Once you click "OK", you can then highlight your tune in iTunes, then you can go to the "Advanced" menu and choose "Convert Selection to MP3" Hope this helps!
hate9wicket	Date: March 2, 2006 @ 12:38 AM Yeah, I had my stuff at 160 , but if you go into the steps ursabear put up, I would use 192, but this would create problems for dial up users, the compromise would be 128.
Distilled1	Date: March 14, 2006 @ 8:19 PM
Distilled1	Date: March 14, 2006 @ 9:09 PM
LiQuidMetamo...	Date: March 15, 2006 @ 12:37 AM Also, noticeable differences between encoder types can happen at lower bitrates (including 128 Kbps) Especially if you use the 'faster' speed option - (you should always use the slowest option as this is the best quality) Most differences even out at bitrates of 192 or above - Frauenhofer's encoder is usually considered best at 128 but many prefer Lame at 192 and other encoders such as Xing and Blade which are faster encoders but not rated highly at 128 or below, have much less differential at 192 and above. Generally, Lame and Frauenhofer are considered better codecs then blade and xing (a subjective opinion but this was the consensus after trawling through a couple dozen web pages who ran tests) - I usually prefer Lame as it is open source but Frauenhofer's encoder is used in Cubase SX/Nuendo (among many other apps such as Nero etc) and although I could use Wavelab, CDEX and CD Tag (Lame codec), if I'm working on a project in my DAW I usually go with that what is there in the export audio (frauenhofer).

Post A Reply
From:	Guest	(Icons - Linking)
Post: