DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: The General Forum: Hm.

Electric guitars, Classical guitars, Guitar amps and more.

zZounds.com offers recording equipment for starting and experienced musicians. Find the best prices on electric guitars, acoustic guitars, classical guitars and more.

Forums > The General Forum

Hm.

Chad	Date: October 21, 2001 @ 11:41 PM http://www.mp3dev.org/mp3/rationale.html , toward the bottom. "Only 128kbit/s bit rate. The mpeg standard tries to cover bitrates from 16kbit/s up to 320. That's a huge range and requires different acoustic and computational models. 128kbit/s produces CD-quality sound for mpeg layer3, AAC and VQF." While I won't argue with the acoustic and computational models... Did I just hear him say that 128kbps MP3 produces CD-quality? Eh? " id="52">http://www.mp3dev.org/mp3/rationale.html , toward the bottom. "Only 128kbit/s bit rate. The mpeg standard tries to cover bitrates from 16kbit/s up to 320. That's a huge range and requires different acoustic and computational models. 128kbit/s produces CD-quality sound for mpeg layer3, AAC and VQF." While I won't argue with the acoustic and computational models... Did I just hear him say that 128kbps MP3 produces CD-quality? Eh?
inertia	Date: October 28, 2000 @ 7:40 PM Is this supposed to be in reply to something?
Chad	Date: October 21, 2001 @ 11:41 PM mp3dev.org." id="55">No, I just found it odd..that someone would say such a thing at mp3dev.org.
Frac	Date: October 21, 2001 @ 11:41 PM It's a page that's 2 years old. I don't think we should hold Mike Cheng accountable for that (I'm sure he feels different about it now)
Chad	Date: October 29, 2000 @ 4:24 PM Yeah, you are right. =)
Expose	Date: December 12, 2002 @ 4:44 PM I agree, that is very stupid. - reviver of old threads
azhazhellfire	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 2:56 AM hehe, niiiice.
ThaCoyote	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 4:07 AM According to what I've heard and according to my own experiences, I find 160 kbps being CD quality. Any higher doesn't make me hear any difference. Unfortunately, 160kbps isn't used that much and is often increased tot 192... But a high bitrate is - of course - not a guarantee for a high quality MP3... The source can be bad, like radio, live or TC, the recording mechanism can suck, like holding a mic in front of radio speakers (a really sad thing) and their WAV-MP3 converter could suck, like Xing (which is an even sadder thing ). I think you probably know most of the stuff, but I feel like writing
azhazhellfire	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 4:19 AM gutted ThaC. this is an old thread, read through it veeeery carefully and make sure to note the dates. hehe.
ThaCoyote	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 5:03 AM ehhh..... haha And that page still exists!!!
Svensta	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 8:43 AM You have to watch thasp, ThaC. He goes around entering sequential thread numbers and reviving any that spark his twisted interests. Still and all, it's a more wholesome hobby than watching TV I suppose
ThaCoyote	Date: December 13, 2002 @ 8:45 AM guess so

Post A Reply
From:	guest	(Icons - Linking)
Post:

© DMusic LLC - Advertising | Employment | TOS | Subscribe