DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: The General Forum: Conspiracy...who knows??

Forums > The General Forum

Conspiracy...who knows??

moedecker	Date: October 19, 2005 @ 9:19 PM http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/lennon_report.htm
IndigoGirl	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 6:48 AM Why do people always have to surround celebrity deaths in conspiracy....
TameasDust	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 6:52 AM cause they get tired of pickin their noses ... sides history blurs facts
GreatGooglyM...	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 3:54 PM Ah, can't be arsed with those conspiracy theories. Eventhough they are pretty interesting.
LegoBreaks	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 6:12 PM Just outa plain interest, who is under the impression that a conspiracy never happened? i mean alot of the general public seem to discount possible events just cause the word 'conspiracy' is next to it. See what i mean 'conspiracy' has become a dirty word. Im not nessasarily talking bout the above situation, but i mean do people take 'conspiracy' to mean never happened. or to mean possibly happened but was covered up so well that its not very easy to prove?
LegoBreaks	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 6:47 PM http://gregorygreene.50megs.com/parallels.html http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/bohos/bohofact.html
Firefly	Date: October 20, 2005 @ 6:49 PM there's a man works down the chip shop says he's Elvis you know.
IndigoGirl	Date: October 21, 2005 @ 6:30 AM Just outa plain interest, who is under the impression that a conspiracy never happened? i mean alot of the general public seem to discount possible events just cause the word 'conspiracy' is next to it. See what i mean 'conspiracy' has become a dirty word. Im not nessasarily talking bout the above situation, but i mean do people take 'conspiracy' to mean never happened. or to mean possibly happened but was covered up so well that its not very easy to prove? Like the plane in the Pentagon?
GreatGooglyM...	Date: October 21, 2005 @ 7:46 AM "Just outa plain interest, who is under the impression that a conspiracy never happened? i mean alot of the general public seem to discount possible events just cause the word 'conspiracy' is next to it. See what i mean 'conspiracy' has become a dirty word. Im not nessasarily talking bout the above situation, but i mean do people take 'conspiracy' to mean never happened. or to mean possibly happened but was covered up so well that its not very easy to prove?" If it could be proved, then it wouldn't be a conspiracy anymore.
zedsalt	Date: October 21, 2005 @ 11:51 AM Now, see, that's exactly the kind of bastardization of the term that LegoBreaks was talking about! The only thing implied by the term "conspiracy" is that something was planned privately.
jfsjfs	Date: October 22, 2005 @ 10:36 PM yeah, people have no idea what the word "conspiracy" means anymore. it generally means 2 or more people privately doing something illegal. Watergate was a conspiracy. Hitler and the Nazis burning down the Reichstag and then blaming it on others was a conspiracy. Martha Stewart was recently involved in a conspiracy. Nowadays, the reporters who broke the Watergate story would be laughed off as crazy conspiracy theorists. The internet and the mostly wacky conspiracy theories on it, have made it very hard for anyone to bring attention to any type of story besides what the government wants you to believe.
zedsalt	Date: October 23, 2005 @ 11:54 AM It doesn't necessarily imply anything untoward. I would hesitate to call a group of people spontaneously deciding to break into a bank a "conspiracy", but, say, planning a surprise birthday party is perfectly conspirational. I suppose there's a connotation that the event planned is illegal or at least immoral, but I don't think that it's any more valid than assuming there isn't any truth to it.
zedsalt	Date: October 23, 2005 @ 11:57 AM I thought Hillary misspoke when she referred to "a vast Right Wing conspiracy". It was, afterall, a very small group of rat bastards acting very publicly.
jfsjfs	Date: October 24, 2005 @ 6:59 PM just a few days ago: ---- Tom DeLay Booked in Houston on Conspiracy, Money Laundering Charges HOUSTON (AP) -- Rep. Tom DeLay turned himself Thursday in at the Harris County sheriff's bonding office, where he was photographed, fingerprinted and released on bond on state conspiracy and money laundering charges. ----
zedsalt	Date: October 25, 2005 @ 11:43 AM http://zedsalt.dmusic.net/pictures?detail=1&picid=47625
zedsalt	Date: October 25, 2005 @ 11:51 AM DeLay's mugshot reminds me of someone, I just can't put my finger on who... I checked Webster's and you know what? The connotation I mentioned, the idea of "conspiracy" merely implying something untoward- that's accepted universally enough that it merits an "especially..." mention in Webster's definition. The idea that it connotes something baseless will probably follow in a few years. What were we talking about? Oh, yeah, John Lennon. Have you ever seen his FBI profile? With all of the photos that had been taken over the years, the "John Lennon" pic in his file is actually Peel, who has recordings marketted through Lennon's label. If this is our "security", we're in BIG trouble.
zer0th	Date: October 25, 2005 @ 6:02 PM You'd have to be crazy to disagree with the fact that most powerful goverments at the momment are corrupt and reguarly lie to their citizens about their misdoing. One of the main ways they get away with all this is the bastardization of the term conspiracy, people are labled conspiracy theorists, thus coined lunatics. The minority that hold power are holding a strong control over the majority creating a pyrimidal power structure, with the help of privatized media they are indoctrinating the greater public into believing their lies. Anyone who dares to disagree with any of the garbage they expect us to believe is labled crazy????

Post A Reply
From:	Guest	(Icons - Linking)
Post: