Username:
Password:
lost p/w?
home
|
help
|
search
|
register
Music
News
Forum
Community
public
search
Forums
>
The General Forum
In your opinion is the RIAA winning or loosing?
the-erm
Date:
October 22, 2004 @ 4:49 PM
I follow this RIAA thing pretty good. It seems
like for every 1 article about the RIAA loosing
out on the p2p battle, I read 10 say they are
winning.
The good news is the ones that whenever I read an
article on giving the p2p crowd some headway it's
always on the big issues.
Like recently:
RIAA must file anonymous "John Doe" lawsuits
http://www.zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto/1012200
4a.php
Then there's the induce act being stopped (that
was good news)
So seriously are they winning?
I don't share on p2p networks any more. I used
to be one of these high volume distributers if
you can call it that.
Until I heard about the sueing. I just can't
afford any of that, and from what I can tell if
we all banned together something could be done.
Erm
DeltaF86
Date:
October 24, 2004 @ 11:03 PM
P2p is crap for quality and for selection these
days it seems. It sucks to much to dl a song with
a modem when you don't know what it is. No p2p
isn't the problem. I think that they will find it
out the hard way when there is no incentive for
either bands to sign or people to buy thier
music. Things will change. In this case, to
another distributer of music.
wet1
Date:
November 8, 2004 @ 9:25 PM
The RIAA has chosen to select the p2p as their
whipping boy to recieve the blame for all their
woes.
What the majors haven't accepted is that isn't
going to fix it. Where the problem really lies
is with an outmoded business model dating back to
the 30's or so when it was considered good
business not to give a sucker an even break (this
coming from an earlier article in the news
feeds). It isn't just the business model alone,
competion for the shelf space in stores, smaller
displays for their product, less distributers,
poor quatlity of artist (which in turn makes for
poor quality music), aiming at the wrong market,
price gouging, stopping the practice of selling
singles, no longer grooming artists for the long
haul, wanting the money now instead of investing
for the future, the locking up of access to be
heard by any artist worth hearing, predatory
business practices, and on and on.
The majors are dead if they don't change. Read
the message on the wall, they have. Rather than
change they have decided to sue customers;
certainly not something that is going to bring
more into the store to buy.
Much like the dinosaurs, the majors are big.
Takes a long while to get the message to the
head.
When it gets tight enough they will play make a
deal with the p2p's. Only then.
doomroot
Date:
November 13, 2004 @ 4:51 AM
They could never stop P2P no matter how much they
try to do - and the truth is they can only do so
much and much of it is scare tactics. The more
they try to stop it the stronger it gets - and
when the record industry realizes that you can't
cell cds in plastic cases that cost $0.10 to make
for $20 then it could only expect major changes
and even some of the legal p2p's are too
expensive right now.
bulletxtheory
Date:
November 14, 2004 @ 6:54 AM
P2P is getting really lame now, it's full of crap
more than ever but they're not gonna get rid of
it just yet, maybe eventually if they lower
prices of cds
Post A Reply
From:
Guest
(
Icons
-
Linking
)
Post:
© DMusic LLC -
Employment
|
TOS
|
Subscribe