DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: The General Forum: Missing genres, any thoughts?

Forums > The General Forum

Missing genres, any thoughts?

ThaCoyote	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 8:56 AM I think we're missing some popular genres like dance, disco, club, trance, R&B... Does anyone agree?
Frawgster	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 12:46 PM I'd like to see a "Bluegrass" genre
smelv1n	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 2:47 PM i'd like to see a "funny bums mumbling/screaming nonsense at people with mircrophones/walls" section...
milladrive	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:15 PM Personally, I think we have too many genres. They all crossover into each other anyway. Why do we need to break down our music into trees? Okay, but I'm a realist, and that's what we do. Makes us feel important. So, to put it into proper perspective, I like that DMusic's genres are not squeezed to death ad nauseum. Twelve is plenty. More than enuff, if ya ask me, which, by the headline of this thread, you have. Dance is r&b; disco is r&b; club is r&b, and r&b is r&b. My point here is that hiphop is r&b and the whole genre should be renamed as such. I've been saying this for years. Hiphop should be renamed R&B. ...and trance can be either electronic or world. Take your pick. More on genres: Blues should be eliminated. People who create the music can decide whether their blues lean more toward rock or toward r&b. And like I've said a zillion times, punk and hardcore should be sent packing to alternative, while ska can be eliminated since it can be either r&b or world. That'd be all for now if Americana weren't staring me in the face. What is Americana? I still haven't figured it out. I'm almost convinced it's a DMusic invention. The music I've heard so far under that moniker I would've accepted in any category among rock, country, or blues (which should be either r&b or rock). Okay, I'm done for now.
Frawgster	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:17 PM I still say we need bluegrass
weaponzero	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:21 PM isn't r&b "rhythym and blues"? i don't see how rap (well, hip hop isn't rap, so maybe we need a genre for that?) is the same :/
milladrive	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:22 PM lol [country]
milladrive	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:25 PM hiphop falls under the auspices of r&b (rhythm & blues). Rap is also r&b. Hiphop CAN be rap, and rap CAN be hiphop, tho not necessarily either, but they're both r&b.
theguppykillers	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 3:59 PM I think we should have a comedy section! I would love to do some comedy and put it on the net! I have lot's of sick twisted idea's burning in my brain!
milladrive	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 4:07 PM I'm not against havin' a Novelty genre.
RyanS	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 4:58 PM I would have to disagree, since a lot of dance/club stuff doesn't fall anywhere near the R&B style. It's maybe closer to electronic. Although there are some styles of dance music that may fall into that genre, I feel that a lot of club music (Trance, Techno, House, Rave, etc) probably should have it's own genre. Maybe there could be sub-genres, to help split some of the differences. Example, under R&B, there could be sub-genres like Rap, Hip-Hop, Soul, etc. Also, like in the above, have sub-genres for Club, too. Just a thought. (Also, having a Comedy genre would be cool, too!)
morgdobwcpt	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 8:19 PM I also must take serious issue with anyone that thinks modern club music (i.e. house/techno/trance/etc...) is r&b. I'm not much a fan of either, but they are most definitely not the same thing." id="6809">I tend to dislike genres (especially sub-genres) in theory, but in practice they're necessary to organize music with some degree of coherency. Take for example the "electronic" genre...by itself this term is meaningless and results in club/dance music getting lumped together with more experimental material, despite there being little. in common between the two save for the use of electronics in their creation. I also must take serious issue with anyone that thinks modern club music (i.e. house/techno/trance/etc...) is r&b. I'm not much a fan of either, but they are most definitely not the same thing.
Cryxan	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 8:23 PM The thing that bothers me is who the hell thought of naming raggae "World?" To me, raggae does not represent all cultures. It is an insult to musicians from other countries." id="6810">From my sister's logic textbook: if all a is b and all b is c, does that mean that all a is c? (The answer is no, but I don't remember how thay justified that.) Seriously now. I also think that there are too many genres. When I get my Columbia House catalog, I have to sift through several categories just to look for stuff that I consider "rock." Way too many of them overlap. The thing that bothers me is who the hell thought of naming raggae "World?" To me, raggae does not represent all cultures. It is an insult to musicians from other countries.
smelv1n	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 8:25 PM i think it should be 2 big genres!! GOOD MUSIC. BAD MUSIC. and we're done! easy as that
draugluin	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 8:29 PM I say add another section entitled "Folk" or "Folklore" for like bluegrass and folk music, cause folk music is pretty wide in many countries. adding a bit of world flavour to the selection of music.
theguppykillers	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 10:02 PM I say bla bla LA la da da la!
mtbatol	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 10:32 PM r&b = club electronic music????????? lmmfao. I'm still trying to figure out that one out imagining the soul singing of a jaguar wright, maxwell, marvin gaye, or jill scott behind a hyperactive beat. And while rap & r-n-b can coexist beautifully for a nice hip hop sound, it just isn't consistant to lump together lets say Prodigy's "Keep It Thoro" with Maxwell's "This Woman's Work" in the same catagory even though rap/hip hop as a whole spawned from the r&b's ever so evolving sound. Only when the singer collaborates with the mc/rapper should the song then be thrown into the hip-hop catagory. I'm done my ranting for now, thank you for reading
backmann	Date: April 3, 2002 @ 11:00 PM Reggae!!!!
ThaCoyote	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 2:05 AM Milla often has good points, but now I really have to disagree with ya! You really think dance/disco/club=R&B? R&B=hip=hop?! So Destiny's Child=D12? and-ehm... DJ Tiesto=Destiny's Child=D12?! C'mon! Wake up! This is 2002. You say you've been thinking that for years. I'd say: rethink! I do, however, agree with your opinion about 12 genres being enough. I also agree that some genres can be eliminated. Like hardcore (hardcore that was since 1995 and r.i.p. in like 1998? Wasn't it?) But if you think 12 genres is enough and 5 of them can be eliminated or merged, then there's place for 5 new ones. Now there are recommendations for: Bluegrass, comedy, trance (& techno), club and the fifth can be another new one. Please reconsider admins Sorry if this thread has any 'angry' intonation
ThaCoyote	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 2:05 AM hmmm.... damn emoticons :fakesmile:
TEENSPIRITKID	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 7:19 AM thank you i really like this site" id="6839">My band is like a punk/alternative/rock band we are all that equally more less we are a grunge band without but my other question is does hardcore refer to bands like slip knot or bands like nirvana (agro slam "core" or "grunge" thank you i really like this site
milladrive	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 9:44 AM Maybe we should head on over to Billboard to check out some official categorization for ourselves. Here, for instance, is the R&B/Hip-Hop album chart. ThaC, you may disagree w/me and Billboard, but, no offense, I'm gonna side w/them. Billboard also does have a separate chart for dance/disco/club, BUT soo many of the artists on it ALSO hit the r&b chart. Does Destiny's Child ever hit the Rock Tracks chart?? Umm, nope. They are indeed r&b. Subclass them into anything you like, but they're still creating r&b. Take a look at the Hot 100. Like it or not, there are only 2 types of music at the top of this chart: rock and r&b. Again, subclass them any way you like, but a burger and fries are still a burger and fries no matter how you dress them up. Like it or not, we simply shouldn't create a new subgenre everytime another artist comes out w/a crossover style. Raggae, for instance, is indeed a form of r&b, and if anything should be coupled w/ska, which plainly and simply derived from reggae. Bluegrass is country. Trance is either electronica, r&b, or world. Comedy will be called "Novelty" when and if it's instated. Novelty is the word ..because not everybody finds them "funny." mtb, like I've said before, even tho b may not necessarily be a, a can still be b. I've been studying this nonsense for a long time, and while I still feel it's nonsense, I am somewhat knowledgeable about it. I bitch about Americana; I know full well what it is. It's modern folk. Just like "alternative" is modern rock. (..and before ya start tellin' be what year it is, folks, let it be known that Billboard does maintain a "Modern Rock Tracks" chart. So, let's all see how quickly we can stop makin' separatists out of ourselves. ..'cause that's all we're doin' by creatin' pointless subfolders. 8)" id="6840">The fact to which many of us seem ignorant here is that "r&b" is much like "rock" in that it covers a whoooolle lotta ground (sub-genres). Just as Elvis Presley, Led Zeppelin, S.O.D., and Creed are all considered "rock," so too are Robert Johnson, James Brown, Marvin Gaye, Prodigy, and Maxwell ALL "r&b." Maybe we should head on over to Billboard to check out some official categorization for ourselves. Here, for instance, is the R&B/Hip-Hop album chart. ThaC, you may disagree w/me and Billboard, but, no offense, I'm gonna side w/them. Billboard also does have a separate chart for dance/disco/club, BUT soo many of the artists on it ALSO hit the r&b chart. Does Destiny's Child ever hit the Rock Tracks chart?? Umm, nope. They are indeed r&b. Subclass them into anything you like, but they're still creating r&b. Take a look at the Hot 100. Like it or not, there are only 2 types of music at the top of this chart: rock and r&b. Again, subclass them any way you like, but a burger and fries are still a burger and fries no matter how you dress them up. Like it or not, we simply shouldn't create a new subgenre everytime another artist comes out w/a crossover style. Raggae, for instance, is indeed a form of r&b, and if anything should be coupled w/ska, which plainly and simply derived from reggae. Bluegrass is country. Trance is either electronica, r&b, or world. Comedy will be called "Novelty" when and if it's instated. Novelty is the word ..because not everybody finds them "funny." mtb, like I've said before, even tho b may not necessarily be a, a can still be b. I've been studying this nonsense for a long time, and while I still feel it's nonsense, I am somewhat knowledgeable about it. I bitch about Americana; I know full well what it is. It's modern folk. Just like "alternative" is modern rock. (..and before ya start tellin' be what year it is, folks, let it be known that Billboard does maintain a "Modern Rock Tracks" chart. So, let's all see how quickly we can stop makin' separatists out of ourselves. ..'cause that's all we're doin' by creatin' pointless subfolders.
forrix	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 10:08 AM if all a is b, and all b is c, does that mean all a is c? if all a(ants) are b(animals), and all b(animals) are c(living creatures), does that mean all ants are living creatures? yes! wait a minute. i thought i was proving it to be no... maybe if all a(living creatures) are b(animals) and... no, wait a min.. that one doesn't work if all alternative is rock and all rock is music, then all alternative IS MUSIC. damnit, the answer is YES@!#!@! go get your sister's book
forrix	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 10:09 AM please...
Cryxan	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 5:57 PM When it's a male singer, it's "Soul" and When it's a white female singing R&B, it's called "R&B flavored?" Forrix, I'll go e-mail my sis now and ask her. I'm not sure what she'll think of me caontacting her out of the blue about this. Oughta be funny. :lol:" id="6870">Ever notice that... When it's a female singer, it's called "R&B" When it's a male singer, it's "Soul" and When it's a white female singing R&B, it's called "R&B flavored?" Forrix, I'll go e-mail my sis now and ask her. I'm not sure what she'll think of me caontacting her out of the blue about this. Oughta be funny.
mtbatol	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 7:09 PM heheh, well yes milla, i agree with the concept of how a can be b but doesn't necessary mean that it should be stuck to it. Well, actually if i were to put r&b and hip hop under the same catagory it would probably be more accurate to name it "urban" but thats just my thought. If anything it's possible for anything to be crossed over with each other so yeah not everything should have a new subcatagory just because someone comes out with lets say, mixing rap and polka together . And last but not least Prodigy is NOT r&b. Him and Havoc of course make up Mobb Deep and well, sayin that they're r&b is like saying Michael Jordan is Australian
Cryxan	Date: April 4, 2002 @ 11:08 PM I think whether we like it or not, when we say the name of a genre, we think of several artists that we feel best represent that genre. So if someone names [artist x] who, by their definition, is deserving of the R&B label, but that artist is too different from the ones you feel represent R&B, you will reject it. So new, broad genres might be a good idea. Anything more specific should be left up to the individual." id="6891">Maybe creating new names like 'urban' is a good idea. Me might say "no way is [artist x] R&B" because our idea of R&B is more clearly defined by [artist y]. I think whether we like it or not, when we say the name of a genre, we think of several artists that we feel best represent that genre. So if someone names [artist x] who, by their definition, is deserving of the R&B label, but that artist is too different from the ones you feel represent R&B, you will reject it. So new, broad genres might be a good idea. Anything more specific should be left up to the individual.
ThaCoyote	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 6:26 AM Milla, if I tell 100 people (including you) that a lot of Trance = R&B, 99 people will laugh in my face. If I tell Trance = electronica about 25 people will laugh in my face. I don't think trance = electronica is that odd, but I don't see why you think that a lot of stuff is 'the same' as R&B. I didn't say Destiny's Child is anything else than R&B. I say it is and it is R&B only. Honestly I don't know what the 'billboard' thing is, but I took a look at your link and I don't see ANY trance/club albums in it, so appearantly they don't think trance/club/dance=R&B. I did notice that some artists like Mary J. Blige also appear in 'Hot Dance music/Club play'. R&B is close to Dance, but not to trance. Don't get me wrong. I don't think we should add a lot of genres so it suits every crossover. Then we'll have over 255 genres. I sometimes miss popular modern genres in Winamp. Winamp has 255 genres! Anyway, you did give me some thinking Milla. Let Trance be electronic, dance be R&B and comedy be novelty, but please separate trance/disco/(ORIGINAL)club from R&B.
ThaCoyote	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 6:29 AM Anyway I think this is a hot discussion
milladrive	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 9:39 AM And you're half right: Michael Jordan may not be Australian, but Mobb Deep has been hittin' the r&b charts (both album and single) since the beginning of 1995. ..w/established frequency. (..Shook Ones, Part 2 was their first hit.) ...seems Prodigy IS r&b. ;) How come "rock" doesn't have such problems defining itself? Must be sumpm in the water. ThaC, when I talk music, I rarely look for 100 average people. ..and if I do, their laughter usually serves only to fuel my desire to educate. After all, most folks laugh at what they don't understand. ;) Your deductions are intriguing. First, Billboard is THE authoritative weekly music publication in the US, and the primary chart reference for the last 100 years. You didn't see any dance/club on the r&b chart, but yet you noticed Mary J. Blige there. Haven't you just contridicted yourself? More importantly, Billboard's free online service offers only the top 20 positions of their 100-position r&b charts. If we want the full charts, we need to subscribe. Point being, if we look at the top of the pop chart, we'll probably not see any country artists there. However, they're there, but they often don't crack the top 20 of the genre. Just because we didn't see any of what we were lookin' for at the top of the r&b chart doesn't mean it's not on the chart or included in the genre. I also never said that trance was definitively r&b. The grouping is dance/disco/club, which are all forms of r&b, no matter how we slice it. Many of the recordings do crossover into other genres, but they're still rooted in r&b. What I did say was that trance is EITHER electronica, r&b, or world. Trance music started evolving in the late 80's under three main influences: the first was the electronic new wave/industrial music of Front 242, Einstruze Neubatten, Killing Joke and the likes; the second was the electronic techno disco of Detroit; and the third was the psychedelic music of the seventies. The most appropriate classification, imo, is electronica. All I implied was that there are many "trance" artists who lean toward an r&b influence. Trance can certainly be a form of r&b. George Clinton will come here and personally kick all our asses if we tell him it's not. ;)" id="6929">"Urban" is a good word for what you describe, and indeed it has been used unofficially for several years. One of the main problems w/it is that it implies that anything that isn't "urban" is either "suburban" or "rural," and we all know there're no such groupings as of today. And you're half right: Michael Jordan may not be Australian, but Mobb Deep has been hittin' the r&b charts (both album and single) since the beginning of 1995. ..w/established frequency. (..Shook Ones, Part 2 was their first hit.) ...seems Prodigy IS r&b. How come "rock" doesn't have such problems defining itself? Must be sumpm in the water. ThaC, when I talk music, I rarely look for 100 average people. ..and if I do, their laughter usually serves only to fuel my desire to educate. After all, most folks laugh at what they don't understand. Your deductions are intriguing. First, Billboard is THE authoritative weekly music publication in the US, and the primary chart reference for the last 100 years. You didn't see any dance/club on the r&b chart, but yet you noticed Mary J. Blige there. Haven't you just contridicted yourself? More importantly, Billboard's free online service offers only the top 20 positions of their 100-position r&b charts. If we want the full charts, we need to subscribe. Point being, if we look at the top of the pop chart, we'll probably not see any country artists there. However, they're there, but they often don't crack the top 20 of the genre. Just because we didn't see any of what we were lookin' for at the top of the r&b chart doesn't mean it's not on the chart or included in the genre. I also never said that trance was definitively r&b. The grouping is dance/disco/club, which are all forms of r&b, no matter how we slice it. Many of the recordings do crossover into other genres, but they're still rooted in r&b. What I did say was that trance is EITHER electronica, r&b, or world. Trance music started evolving in the late 80's under three main influences: the first was the electronic new wave/industrial music of Front 242, Einstruze Neubatten, Killing Joke and the likes; the second was the electronic techno disco of Detroit; and the third was the psychedelic music of the seventies. The most appropriate classification, imo, is electronica. All I implied was that there are many "trance" artists who lean toward an r&b influence. Trance can certainly be a form of r&b. George Clinton will come here and personally kick all our asses if we tell him it's not.
creativetim	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 10:18 AM Did anyone say crap yet? There are so many groups the deserve to be put in the genre of shame, crap!
creativetim	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 10:19 AM From actually reading, I'm getting the idea that this topic was meant for dmusic's genres not the industry's, oops. Well now you know how I feel!
milladrive	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 10:54 AM Well, it was originally intended to be a discussion of DMusic's genres, but why should our genres be any different from the rest of musicdom? If it weren't for the industry, the world wouldn't even know what a genre is.
RyanS	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 2:00 PM A lot of times when you see R&B artists on the dance/club charts, it's because they are remixes
milladrive	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 6:08 PM You're absolutely right, Ryan. Production is the only thing that makes a song fit a particular genre. Hell, put a twang on it, and we'll be two-steppin' to it.
wattzz	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 10:56 PM mmm.. bluegrass
hugzkissez4u	Date: April 5, 2002 @ 11:25 PM I would liuke to see some r&b or even some rap or something like that!
creativetim	Date: April 6, 2002 @ 2:15 AM rap ... bleh!
atest	Date: April 7, 2002 @ 12:58 PM SUMMARY: BLUEGRASS Crabgrass RAP wrapped R&B and SOUL trance urban suburban rural Jazz acid jazz base jazz chlorine jazz bromine jazz easy listening hard listening negro spirituals wedding music bar mitzvah music polkas techno techyes any more?
milladrive	Date: April 7, 2002 @ 6:19 PM hehe. rrright.
pog	Date: April 7, 2002 @ 7:51 PM I agree with milla on this, otherwise where does it end ? Looking for the Urban-industrial-psycho-dance-jungle-skank section ? Or was it the New-wave-hardcore-rasta-punk section ? It'd get outta hand This is a perfect example of less is more, cos realistically, there's 4 types of Jungle Drum & Bass alone ! I'd hate to think how many different hardcore or rock genre there is.
leflaw	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 6:34 PM there are only four types of music: A music B music C Music E Music (But what happened to DMUSIC, d place 4 d music on d web?)
timwicaljr	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 6:46 PM Folk rock - Jewel Power pop - Letters to cleo these are examples of the seemingly never ending genres that keep on comming up, maybe its due to the inability to put music into mass genres. No one wants their fav band to be in the same genre as a crappy band so someone makes up some new genre name to protect their band. Who the hell put Semisonic into the Brit pop genre ??? It boggles the mind.
pog	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 9:44 PM " id="7219">heheh yeah ppl are like "How dare you put my electronica in with kylie minogue", when they should be happy to have their fav music in with the mainstream gaining more followers.
mtbatol	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 10:11 PM lmmfao, was ol skool gospel last time i checked.. for some reason that just caught my attention :lol:" id="7220">wtf@ the guy who said "negro spirituals" lmmfao, was ol skool gospel last time i checked.. for some reason that just caught my attention
Cryxan	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 10:45 PM I think "Old Skool" has been redefined. It now means any pop that is more than 5 years old. Just like the "Oldies" definition is in a state of flux. Some supposedly oldies sections/radio stations/etc include 80's music. That's sick.
mtbatol	Date: April 8, 2002 @ 11:09 PM :O:O" id="7223">hmmmmmm... imagines juvinille's "Back Dat Ass Up" being on oldies radio stations 30 years from now
RyanS	Date: April 9, 2002 @ 6:25 PM Yeah I can see it now, I'd be 60 listening to an oldies station, and shaking my ass to Juvenile.. Bet my future grand kids would love that
EasyMidas	Date: April 12, 2002 @ 1:00 PM I don't know what all the fuss is about...It's not as though this site has more than about 10 artists in each genre anyway!!!
pog	Date: April 13, 2002 @ 1:30 AM hmmm, 12 genre's... That means we're dealing with about 120 artists here, that's what the big deal is.
jumbobrian	Date: April 13, 2002 @ 3:39 AM as long as they keep the Punk/Ska section, im happy.
milladrive	Date: April 13, 2002 @ 11:17 AM hih, i give up.
dasuspectz2002	Date: April 13, 2002 @ 4:04 PM dasuspectz2002.dmusic.com" id="7575">everyone checc out our songs at dasuspectz2002.dmusic.com
leflaw	Date: April 13, 2002 @ 7:47 PM admin.dmusic.com and it dID NOT WORK!!!!!!" id="7594">I treied to add genres in admin.dmusic.com and it dID NOT WORK!!!!!!
fallingstars	Date: April 17, 2002 @ 7:28 PM genres and sub-genres may crossover, but have their 'defining' characteristics...and help listeners find the music THEY want to hear, if you are in the r&b section, but are looking for rap or hiphop, you dont wanna be running into bands that arent the style you are looking for...
cloisaida	Date: April 18, 2002 @ 2:30 PM we're not missing any genres of music because like every srtist that comes out and we encouner their music exhibits sounds from all genres which makes it very presentable to different people with different interest. And when they do it in a remarkable way like Citizen Cope its nice but so hard to uncover and breakdown
mcarp555	Date: April 18, 2002 @ 5:29 PM Having read all the above, it's quite odd when you consider Dmusic itself sets up artificial separations within their own genres, such as 'trash pile', 'bin' and 'DM picks'. Howzabout we worry about 'Urban house west coast jungle dance' vs. 'Techno world newage DJ trance' AFTER we can upload a song and it shows up somewhere?
ThaCoyote	Date: April 19, 2002 @ 10:26 AM Now we've all raged out, are there any conclusions that can be drawn from this? No changes in genres?
milladrive	Date: April 19, 2002 @ 1:05 PM nope.
creativetim	Date: April 19, 2002 @ 2:50 PM Pfft
pog	Date: April 19, 2002 @ 10:56 PM narf !
mtbatol	Date: April 20, 2002 @ 4:02 PM EEEEEEEEeeeEEE GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD BRAIN!!!!
backmann	Date: April 20, 2002 @ 5:11 PM zort!!!
backmann	Date: April 20, 2002 @ 5:12 PM (that's troz backwards)
creativetim	Date: April 20, 2002 @ 5:15 PM Ugh
JohnnyBoomBoom	Date: May 9, 2002 @ 8:17 PM Well I'm a singer songwriter with just vocals and acoustic guitar. I've never really considered myself folk because my music isnt really about folky topics. So I put myself into Americana, which is, for the person who was trying to figure it out. Anything thats sort of typical of america. I figure coffeehouse rock is an american enough thing to go into Americana. But whatever, I really just needed a place to put my files since my web directory ran out of space!
just2ska	Date: August 3, 2005 @ 10:49 AM i say break down evehting into 12001304194 genres and let people pick up to 310913 for each song.
BlackMage	Date: August 3, 2005 @ 12:16 PM I was wondering when someone was going to reply to this yet again for some unexplained reason popped up thread made in 2002...
BlackMage	Date: August 3, 2005 @ 12:17 PM And I'm missing a comma. And a brain too. Silly me.
just2ska	Date: August 3, 2005 @ 12:18 PM mmhmm!!
psychosis7	Date: August 14, 2005 @ 1:55 AM classical Rock Blues/country electronic/dance R&B/Hip-hop
psychosis7	Date: August 14, 2005 @ 1:55 AM + other
shadowself	Date: August 14, 2005 @ 12:14 PM I think the genres can be doubled just by adding the word "core" to the existing genres. Everyone else is doing it! Just think... classical-core, blues-core, hardcore-core, peace-core, apple-core... /thinks this whole 'core' fetish is retarded
shadowself	Date: August 14, 2005 @ 4:00 PM POLKA-CORE!!!
Intergalacti...	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 8:11 AM Flamenco.X.Core
zedsalt	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 11:52 AM the banging together of rocks, accompanied by gutteral noises and wailing: Corecore!
gimpnipples	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 11:56 AM noise music! power electronics!
kingo	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 11:56 AM The sound of tectonic plates moving: Earthcore.
DeadraveN	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 12:00 PM the sound of tuna: Albecore.
kingo	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 12:15 PM I thought that was porn with Jessica Alba in it.
just2ska	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 12:36 PM Prostitute Rock: WhoreCore
Jesuszilla	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 3:44 PM What you gots to do is get every genre on the site now, and then have all of them for each religion. For example, Christian Rock, Scientology Rock, Kabbalah Rock (how they afford to buy any instuments or get away from the compound I don't know). Think of the possibilities!
JakeC	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 4:58 PM Trance sounds nothing like Techno. Techno Sounds nothing like Trance. Trance should be added as it gets annoying putting Electronic for a track that doesn't have the downtempo more expreimental stylings of the electronic genre.
MindSculpture	Date: August 15, 2005 @ 5:03 PM Amish deth-metal opera
shadowself	Date: August 16, 2005 @ 12:11 PM The genres for every religion idea is hilarious. Kabbalah rock indeed.
zedsalt	Date: August 16, 2005 @ 12:22 PM "Gorecore" seems like a natural; is that term being used? Maybe we should reserve it for Death Metal bands having at least one anthropophagite member.
mattbanx	Date: August 16, 2005 @ 12:38 PM Gorecore is borecore.
mattbanx	Date: August 16, 2005 @ 12:40 PM Oh, I was thinking of our former vice president. He started the Internet you know?

Post A Reply
From:	Guest	(Icons - Linking)
Post: