DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: Submit News Tips: CREED breaks up!

Forums > News: Submit News Tips

CREED breaks up!

robbydadrummer	Date: June 4, 2004 @ 4:34 PM for all of us who can't stand the band, the wait for their demise is over! http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/news/2004-06-04-creed-disbands_x.htm?csp=27
milladrive	Date: June 4, 2004 @ 5:04 PM Never really cared much for them. Interestingly, I notice they had only three albums. Not to make comparisons or anything ('cause there is no comparison), but The Beatles had 13 albums and enough for two more in non-album tracks in the same amount of time.
robbydadrummer	Date: June 4, 2004 @ 6:04 PM lol...
alexamustang	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 8:57 AM FUCK YEAH!!
Svensta	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 9:52 AM Somehow they have enough material for a Greatest Hits compilation. I think people should have an album full of hits before qualifying for one of these things.
Thaspian	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 9:34 PM milla, not EVERYONE makes music that fast. Some of my favorite bands make even less in the same amount of time. sven is correct.
milladrive	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 10:02 PM Thasp, actually, the real truth is that times have changed. The standard in those days was to put out about two albums a year. Today, with costs the way they are, the standard is more like an album every two or three years. ...And hey, penguin, don't make it out like you're some music listening veteran. heh
Thaspian	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 11:27 PM Veteran. How the heck can a band produce an album of over 40 minutes in six months? I picture a group of people who haven't slept or left a studio in weeks just hitting their instruments in a daze attempting to make it sound like music.
furiousBall	Date: June 5, 2004 @ 11:47 PM it's one thing to have people hate you... http://www.creedsucks.com/ but when you get sued by your fans for sucking...now that's some serious suckitude... http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/creedsuit1.html
Thaspian	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 12:20 AM I just dled My Sacrifice.. I've never heard a worse recorded album. No dymamics at all, and the cymbals sound like a 48k MP3. Totally unrealistic sounding. Did I mention the singer says free "fee"? And memories as "memoies"?
Intergalacti...	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 1:09 PM I write 50 minute albums in three months pretty much and i could probably get them recorded in a month i could do four albums a year. And once every four years I get one day off for leap year
MisledMayhem	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 2:21 PM I am happy, Creed sucked, but we're still gonna have to hear their retarded songs on the radio every once in a while, and so they're not gone for good yet, which sucks.
Svensta	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 3:50 PM Well, MM, it could have been worse. If the lead singer for Creed died or ESPECIALLY if he killed himself, you would get nothing but Creed for months and months now, coupled with all this unreleased hooey. You know, people should understand that. Dead artists have unreleased music. ALL artists have unreleased music. This is because sometimes you write something that BLATANTLY sucks and should NOT be released. For whatever reason, dying should NOT make these stinko's suddenly worthwhile. Oh, and Rush puts out a full studio album on average once every 18-20 months. For like 30 YEARS, this has been. And they only have probably 5 greatest hits albums. And they have enough talent to do so, imho. So if the standard artist has to release every what...3-4 years, then how come no one has told that to Axl yet?
Intergalacti...	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 4:22 PM I'm not being funny guys but you didn't like their music OK say that and stop gettin wound up cos a lot of people liked their music or otherwise they wouldn't have sold god knowes how many records. And they are talented enough to write music and play music so why should they deserve less respect? (If you've met the guy and he's a complete cock then I understand but otherwise I just think its a bit unfair thats all)
chrismacmanus	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 5:16 PM Just 'cause you write and play music doesn't mean that you have to be respected. Robbie Williams writes his own stuff you know, def don't respect him
milladrive	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 7:31 PM I just find it intriguing that Scott Stapp's biggest vocal influences were Eddie Vedder and Cher.
robbydadrummer	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 7:38 PM it only takes 3-4 months to make a quality release, especially if the band has worked on the material before going into the studio. a lot of artists still release an album every 12-18 months. it depends on whether the artist is inclined to do so, and if the label people will stay out of the way. labels love to 'milk' the success of an album for as long as possible, and will delay a new release if the previous release is still generating good sales.
robbydadrummer	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 7:43 PM scott stapp is a wastoid. nobody knew he was always getting thrown out of clubs in his previous bands before Creed for being a drunk or drug-crazed obnoxious ass. mtv always makes these people to be all-glammerous at first and the public is gullible enough to believe it. sorry, but that's the truth.
sinai	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 11:10 PM i think we owe god a beer now. or something
sinai	Date: June 6, 2004 @ 11:13 PM and Sven...Rage Against the Machine only put out 3 original albumns and they were together for over a decade. all three belong on any top ten list, well...WELL above Rush
milladrive	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 12:01 AM sinai, I'm... I'm... pauses some more ...I'm really sorry to hear you say that. ...but then, coming from someone who thinks Elvis was better than The Beatles, I guess it should be expected. ...altho I agree with the beer debt.
Intergalacti...	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 4:24 AM I respect Robbie Williams to an extent. I'm not sayin they have to be respected I just think they ought to be thats all. Hehe the beatles rule over Elvis. Who was Scott Stapp?
sinai	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 10:57 AM fuck the beatles
Intergalacti...	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 2:20 PM Elvis is dead Get over it
sqrlcub	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 3:44 PM Even though I didn't like them and thought they were way overexposed, I didn't want to see them break up. It is hard enough to get a decent career going in music that I can't quite justify actively wanting any bands to break up... well with the exception of premade boy bands (and girl bands) like N Sync and Brittany Spears.
milladrive	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 6:52 PM Heh, there's always an exception. lol, ya know what the scariest part of that is, sinai? It's that you actually mean it. lol ...Well, at least I can rest easy knowing that there's plenty of room on my palette for both Elvis AND The Beatles.
Svensta	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 8:15 PM Comparing best loved bands is like... talking religion. Some people you can't just get started. For teh record, Rage Against the Machine is an oversensationalized bunch of crybabies Well, I mean, they certain whine a lot. That being said I really love "Darkness"
sinai	Date: June 7, 2004 @ 11:37 PM you sicken me
milladrive	Date: June 8, 2004 @ 12:08 AM
robbydadrummer	Date: June 8, 2004 @ 5:57 AM i gotta vote for rush over ratm also... though ratm was better than that audioslave album. as for the darkness...
BedroomSessions	Date: June 8, 2004 @ 7:51 AM lets not get started on the 'favourite band ever' discussion this seems to be leading to

Post A Reply
From:	guest	(Icons - Linking)
Post: