DMusic.com | for indie musicians and fans | Free MP3 music downloads - Forums: Recording: Cool Edit Pro 2.1, good or bad?

zZounds.com offers recording equipment for starting and experienced musicians. Find the best prices on electric guitars, acoustic guitars, classical guitars and more.

Forums > Music: Recording

Cool Edit Pro 2.1, good or bad?

RobertMcDade	Date: May 9, 2005 @ 11:55 AM I use Cool Edit Pro 2.1, is there something better? Or should I just stick with that?
ciferno	Date: May 11, 2005 @ 4:42 PM I also use cool edit pro - I love it. I have tried cakewalk and hated it. I like the idea with cool edits multi track you can mike I think up to 24 tracks, don't quote me on that though. The built in effects are nice also. Unfortunately it's now an adobe product. Can't remember the name at the moment.
Dizeazed	Date: May 11, 2005 @ 5:39 PM I'm strictly ACID... however, everyone keeps telling me to switch over to Cool Edit Pro... Thinking about doing it this summer.
Emcee-JiLt	Date: May 11, 2005 @ 9:08 PM it's adobe audition. and that isnt a bad thing ciferno, the program is MUCH more indepth now and has many more features. and i dont like acid... last time i used acid there was no way to edit individual waves like you can in cool edit... but maybe it's changed since then.
FREEZYSHOP	Date: May 13, 2005 @ 1:08 PM ADOBE AUDTION IS COOL... ITS A VERY GOOF WAVE EDITING PROGRAM.... BUT IF YOUR ARE TYRING TO GO IN DEPTH OF MULTY TRACKING, YOU SHOULD TRY SONAR, NUENDO, CUBASE, DIGITAL PERFORMER OR, PROTOOLS